Jacobson cited a variety of solar, geothermal, wind, hydroelectric and battery storage projects in the pipeline, stressing that “there’s really no reason California can’t get to like 80 percent renewables by 2030 or even 2027.”įrom a technical perspective, he expressed confidence that California would have no problem meeting its renewable energy targets. The decisions appeared to run counter to climate goals the state has set over the past five years. Keeping the Diablo site open, officials contended, could help tide the state over as it transitions to an entirely renewable energy economy. The CPUC maintained that doing so served “to guard ratepayers from the type of natural gas price spikes that occurred last winter.”Īnd about a year before that, state lawmakers - with the governor’s support - passed legislation seeking to extend the shelf life of the decades-old Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. While nuclear power plants do not generate greenhouse gases, they produce a small amount of radioactive waste. “And in fact, with the current technology, we have the ability to build a much more resilient electricity grid.” Controversial power plant extensionsĮarlier this month, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted unanimously in favor of increasing the capacity of the Aliso Canyon natural gas storage facility - a site that was also home to the nation’s biggest methane leak in 2015. “We have abundant renewable clean energy resources,” Laura Deehan, state director for Environment California, told The Hill. But many scientists and environmental advocates believe this step is unnecessary - and that the state would succeed in providing ample power and attaining its goals without keeping such plants open.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |